Posts Tagged ‘Mining’

Personal vs. catastrophic accidents

Thursday, March 26th, 2009

Safet at work blog (a very useful and active safety blog) reported a list of recent BHP fatalities. One quick observation of the BHP fatalities is that they are primarily personal accidents, not catastrophic accidents (e.g. Beaconsfield rock fall fatality).

A recent special issue of Safety Science (Vol. 47) discusses the confusion about process safety indicators and personal safety indicators. I think some of the discussions are relevant to the mining industry or other geotechnical industry (e.g. construction of tunnels). Process safety indicators are essentially major hazard indicators, which may not correlate with personal safety indicators (e.g. LTI, MTI). In Beaconsfield there appears to be a lack of attention on major hazard indicators. There were rock falls in October 2005, March 2006 and days before the day of the accident (26 April 2006), but the response appears to be  inadequate.

One possibility is to require mines to report such major hazard indicators to relevant safety regulators (e.g. Workplace Standards Tasmania) periodically so that the mines will pay more attention to these indicators and the regulators can step in when necessary.

Safety Case Development

Monday, January 28th, 2008

Following up to the earlier post on safety case. Found an article that details how to develop a safety case. Will be a good read for people trying to learn about safety case.

http://www.adelard.com/papers/sss98web.pdf

And here is the safety case guidelines by the National Offshore Petroleum Authority.

Safety Case for mining industry in Australia

Tuesday, January 8th, 2008

Just got to know about this from a safety professional based in Perth. Anyone else has information about this? Found this link on the internet: http://www.cfmeu.com.au/storage//documents/OHSbriefFeb07.pdf 

I know that HSE in UK had been safety case approach for years to regulate the offshore and oil industry. I believe it is quite an effective means, but it can become a paper exercise if not used properly. Singapore uses a similar approach for high risk installations. When new installations apply for approval from the government, the National Environment Agency will require a QRA to be done (http://www.nea.gov.sg/cms/pcd/qra_guidelines.pdf).